Which statement NOT describes the positivist rejection of certain ways of knowing?

Which statement NOT describes the positivist rejection of certain ways of knowing?

• A. Intuition or faith are not the sources of genuine knowledge.
• B. Sensory experience and scientific methods are central.
• C. Knowledge is derived from revelation.
• D. Empirical observation underpins conclusions.

Answer: (C)

Positivism holds that genuine knowledge comes from observable, verifiable phenomena and the scientific method, not from intuition, faith, or sources that can’t be empirically tested. In this view, intuition or faith are not sources of knowledge, sensory experience and scientific methods are central, and conclusions are built on empirical observation. The statement that knowledge is derived from revelation does not fit this framework—it reflects a religious or revelation-based way of knowing, which positivism rejects as a source of knowledge because it cannot be verified through observation. So that option is the one that does not describe the positivist rejection of certain ways of knowing.

Positivism holds that genuine knowledge comes from observable, verifiable phenomena and the scientific method, not from intuition, faith, or sources that can’t be empirically tested. In this view, intuition or faith are not sources of knowledge, sensory experience and scientific methods are central, and conclusions are built on empirical observation. The statement that knowledge is derived from revelation does not fit this framework—it reflects a religious or revelation-based way of knowing, which positivism rejects as a source of knowledge because it cannot be verified through observation. So that option is the one that does not describe the positivist rejection of certain ways of knowing.